It was a misty and chilly day
in Glen Ellen and the Bay area that day.
There were 6 persons in attendance at this Lodge Meeting. Larry - Made a request to be the moderator for the meeting, to which there were no objectors.
Larry is also the author
of these notes, and as they are from memory, he requests forgiveness for any inaccuracies therein. Larry introduced himself as a regular attendee of the meetings for several years and by profession as a holistic
veterinarian.
How the vision of Eden resonates
with his profession is that he feels he is trying to get individuals into a more healthy state, but sees the difficulties in this when the present underlying environment and societal circumstances are sick. Personally he is interested in finding a place for a family to live a more
natural life.
Arlie - Found out
about the project through the internet and has been
participating in the Egroup. Introduced herself by profession as having worked in the telecom field and now works in the field of graphic design (the specifics of which I was not able to fully understand but relate to land mapping). Personal interests of finding rural land natural home building and organic gardening were mentioned.
Amy - Was escorted
to the meeting. The escort unfortunately could not
stay very long. A park ranger by profession, and personal interests inliving on rural land within a community setting. Amy found out about the meeting from an internet message board.
David - A rural
Sonoma county resident, and architectural expert by
profession expressed his frustrations with getting regulatory approval for
alternative/group home designs in Sonoma County. Personal knowledge of permaculture and of rural communities in the bioregion, and personal interests in growing and nurturing permacultural plant ecosystems were expressed.
Perry- Arrived
after the meeting had started. Currently a San Francisco resident, Perry found out about Eden project through the internet and has introduced himself in the egroup. Perry is knowledgeable of urban communities and of computer resources, and was able to give some ideas for better technology services for internet
groups. Perry is actively searching for a place to be on the land, and to him Eden Valley truly seems like Eden. Expressed an enthusiasm for living on the land, planting trees and raw foods.
T - Introduced
by the moderator as the visionary founder of the Eden
Project is a rural/off grid Sonoma County resident at the present time. T has been committed to developing the Eden project for 9 years, as a
part of being committed to preserving the nature of the bioregion. As is usual for the meetings the issue of what the status of the proposed land for the Eden project is was brought up.
T acknowledged that
the valley is owned privately and the owners have no known intention of selling it. T has not been actively negotiating any sale of the land with the owners. He feels that to go to the owners with a proposal without the sufficient backing of a substantially proven group could endanger the project.
As regards looking into
other lands for the project T expressed that he
believes the best way to buy land is to find the land you want, go directly to the owners when you are ready to buy the land, and not until and then let them know what you are able to pay for the land and on what terms and what your vision for the use of the land is.
T feels that in general
realtors do not offer the choicest of lands available and that by nature they tend to be an agent of the seller not the buyer. Arlie expressed her agreement with this from her experience of looking for rural land. Various physical logistic considerations regarding Eden Valley and surrounding areas were contributed.
Some of the highlights are listed
here: Eden valley is at 2300 feet elevation. It has frosts and would most
likely have a 6 month growing season.
The current road
goes over a mountain pass of 4000 feet peak elevation which
would receive snow. That would make access difficult at times in the winter. It would be good to develop an alternate route that does not go over such a high pass.
Animals (non human) in Eden
were discussed. Larry suggested about 100
pounds of domestic animals per acre. T said he has already proposed in a previous issue of the Eden Journal a sum of 700 lbs per 5 acres. Arlie lamented that this might preclude horses from being in Eden, and most expressed the desire to have horses around. However, people could group together to have a horse, or someone without a desire for a lot of domestic animals could give their acreage as an allotment to someone else.
T thinks that
cattle would not fit well in Eden and believes that goats would be better. The only reason for limits on animals is to prevent excessive denudation of vegetation. T mentioned that special considerations to the issue of domestic animals would be implemented in the proposed vegan village. There are good supplies of water for Eden but of course they would not be unlimited.
T expects that
there should be at least 300 gallons of potable water per day delivered to each home site. This would be quite sufficient for domestic uses if composting toilets are used. Greywater could be used agriculturally.
A figure of 100 gallons per day was suggested as needed to keep an acre of land wet enough for plant
productivity in the dry season.
Arlie suggested
incorporating rain
water collection into the design of buildings for extra water resources. Arlie expressed concern that for home design some of the sites might not
be suitable for natural home building because of lack of exposure to sun.
T thought lack of exposure
might be a factor for only 2 of the particular sites and that wood stoves might need to be used a little more there. Perry thought that even if so, living at one of those sites would still
be 'Eden' for him.
David expressed concern about
the maintenance of roads. He mentioned a Northern California community (Greenfield) that is almost falling apart over the issue of road maintenance. T also had some knowledge of that community and felt that those difficulties were due in part to privatization of home sites in the community.
T feels that the Eden project
could avoid these difficulties especially if a good reserve of group monetary reserves is maintained so that large maintenance projects could be paid for.
Amy suggested that there is a network of smaller Northern California land based communities forming that are considering sharing assets like heavy equipment.
As in past meetings
the issues around monetary finances were actively
discussed. It was clarified that private deed to the individual home sites is not part of the plan for Eden.
This translates to that
if an individual or group of individuals were to depart from their home site, sale to
another private party would not be a recourse. Transfer to another individual or group of individuals subject to approval of the Stewards council might still be possible.
The Steward's Council
would be the
governing body of Eden comprised of one representative from each homestead, with a 3/4 consensus rule. T discussed that there would be different levels of individual contribution towards the project. On the one end of the spectrum may be some wealthy backers who would pledge large amounts of financial support if the project was to run into financial difficulties.
On the other end of the spectrum
would be groups of people with a minimum of finances available and they could support the project for a minimum of about $380 month. The total average contribution of early members of the project would be $30,000 per home site. Later that would have to go up. The Eden land base would be owned by a nonprofit corporation, keeping taxes low.
The question was raised
on how to start contributing money resources. There is a seed fund established in a nonprofit bank account (see Summer Solstice Journal, 2000). It is only recommended for those who are comfortable in taking this step.
Contributors
of $1500 or more to the
seed fund will become the initial members of the Steward's Council. At present there has been one contributor of $1500 to the seed fund. T suggests that when there are 9 members on the Steward's Council many real and practical steps to advancing the project could be decided upon.
Larry suggested another way
of starting to get the funds of the group together:
There has recently been established a permaculture credit union. Contact at www.pcuonline.org, or 4250 Cerillos Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505, or phone 505 954 3479.
Their mission is
to pool the financial resources of all the people who believe in Permaculture embodied in the ethics of Care of the Earth, Care of the People, and Reinvestment of the Surplus to Benefit the Earth and its Inhabitants.
What is being proposed
to the PCU is that potential backers of the Eden
Project would deposit funds in personal accounts under their own control, and that there would be a tabulation of the total funds so that the project could monitor the available resources.
Financial considerations
led to issues of governance being discussed. Perry asked why each person in Eden would not have a vote. T feels that this would be potentially too large a group for effective consensual meetings and discussions to be held among the full population. Eden will have 300 to 500 people living in it.
Perry was also concerned that
too
strong a governance of personal affairs on the home site would be a negative aspect and this was widely agreed to. The question was posed to T what if the Council disagreed with some of the precepts that he has envisioned as founder of the project.
T replied that he didn't think
it would happen as he thought that what he
has layed down were just the basics that all could agree on before they become involved. Anybody who had any problem with it whether real or imaginary would not be attracted to the project. In this way people will self select or deselect themselves as the case may be.
The following question was
whether there would be written agreement contracts for joiners of the project, to which T said yes. Issues of governance seemed to lead into issues of philosophy.
Amy asked what
the projected time table for the project to become a reality as far as getting the land. T expects that it will be about 3 to 5 years. T feels that there are already a lot of steps that have been taken that are not obviously visible.
Mentioned were
the getting together of a group (numbered at about 300 persons on and offline), and decisions that those individuals have made that would assist there involvement in the project from reallocating and saving resources to selecting a particular type of vehicle.
The question was asked
as to what to do in the interim time period. T thinks that other than accumulating resources, people could consider moving on up into the surrounding area. Ukiah was mentioned as a nice city, and Willits as a smaller relatively inexpensive town and was closest to the project.
Another possibility
that some are considering and initiating is to form smaller communal groups with the intent of moving them to Eden when it becomes available. The question was asked if the project could be initiated on a smaller scale, with a smaller land area and/or fewer persons.
T feels that the land
being considered would not be suitable for the purpose if it was divided. Larry felt that there needs to be a good number of people to have the diversity of skills that would be needed to have a small village function well.
The meeting ended after about 2 hours, with the participants being a little
chilled. And that was a subversive act. We do need people who can be counted on
to take very precise and in depth Meeting Notes who will type them up and send
them in as an official report of what took place.
- T